#14 open
Steve Klabnik

StatusNet Groups

Reported by Steve Klabnik | 2011-03-31 16:56:24 UTC | in Full ostatus support

Comments and changes to this ticket

  • singpolyma

    singpolyma 2011-03-31 20:01:51 UTC

    Some problems with using special "groups" instead of just making every hashtag a "group" (ie: OStatus-enabled/followable hashtags):

    1) Usually introduces special new microsyntax
    2) Can cause data duplication (if someone wants something to be tagged and also go to a group)
    3) Can be an excuse to not implement followable hashtags (even thouh those are really useful by themselves)

  • Steve Klabnik

    Steve Klabnik 2011-04-02 19:56:50 UTC

    • State changed from “new” to “open”
    • Milestone set to “Full ostatus support”
    • Milestone order changed from “13” to “0”

    I do agree that groups are awkward. They are part of the ostatus spec, though, so at least the gem should properly support them.

    I do like the idea of making hashtags groups, and no other way of doing it, though. I do agree that the whole !whatever syntax is kinda awkward.

  • singpolyma

    singpolyma 2011-04-04 15:58:09 UTC

    Sure, this is a part of the OStatus spec that was a bit poorly done, since really groups are just users that repeat whatever you Salmon to them, but whatever.

    +1 to implementing groups at the protocol level but making them indistinguishable from hashtags in the UI.

Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.

With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.

New ticket Create new ticket

Create your profile

Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป

Shared Ticket Bins

People watching this ticket

Pages